popcorn.gif

Jan. 6th, 2011 12:21 am
ceasetoexist: (Smug)
[personal profile] ceasetoexist
So. Okay.

I can't be the only one finding this hysterical, right? I mean you all do get what's going on?

It doesn't really matter which one we choose, we're getting used. It doesn't really matter if we pick Lucy or the Postman or whatever. We're just being screwed around with either way for the other to get what they want.

And you know? Even if we do pick the Postman? No guarantee we get to go home, or leave, or whatever. As far as we know what the guy summons may be something just to kill all of us. Lucy's a godawful little witch, but at least we know where we stand with her most of the time.

Really, I just think it's going to be awesome to see what happens next. So, which one of the two are you morons going to let yourself be tugged around by and side with?

Date: 2011-01-06 07:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godisachild.livejournal.com
Of course he is. In doing so, he's going to try and solve the problem, if there is one to begin with. Personally, I think he's trying to start a lynch mob. He said he wanted a "dead Mayfield", after all. And if he can't get them to willingly leave, he'll get rid of them in a different way.

Personally, I think he's not going to send us home. More then likely, in order to get what he wants, it would be simpler to kill us. Why he needs everyone's acceptance for what he's going to do regardless, I don't know, and that bothers me. But it doesn't change what I believe.

Date: 2011-01-06 07:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badend-replay.livejournal.com
This is not the first time they have tried to turn us against each other. The tactic is getting dull, but is a decent hint. To stir up mistrust accomplishes two things; to provoke violent lynchings and to break up unity among ourselves. As we have seen them to have the ability to cause chaos and violence without our help, I believe the unity of those trapped here to be the intended target.

[ and she'll wait for a reply. It feels nice not to talk to wine for once. ]

Date: 2011-01-06 07:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godisachild.livejournal.com
That'd be the most likely reason. The people here are violent enough, but if they can increase that and cause us to aim it at each other even more? The better for them. Some people think its hard to fight a two-front battle. Sometimes it is. But when it's a battle of social control, its actually incredibly simple. You just have to pretend you're on the other ones side when you speak to them.

Or in this case, you provide a figure head for each side.

[He'd never admit it, but talking this way to someone who sounds like they're stuck near his age AND human? Kind of nice.]

Date: 2011-01-06 07:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badend-replay.livejournal.com
... By splitting the target of our anger into these many people, the battle for us becomes larger. Many of those they seem to rule Mayfield also fail to get along very well, at least on the outside, but none of them truly seem to be on our side.

Should giving us multiple enemies be their plan, then I might almost applaud them... It will certainly make it more difficult.

Date: 2011-01-06 07:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godisachild.livejournal.com
Tbey're going to try and wear us thin, both by splitting us apart and by trying to make it a war of attrition. If they can't win by splitting us apart, they'll wear us down.

Considering how easily everyone appears to be manipulated? It'll be incredibly difficult.

Date: 2011-01-06 07:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badend-replay.livejournal.com
I worry they will not learn fast enough. However, I will continue to believe in those who are trying to resist. That may be all we are reduced to doing, at this rate.

Date: 2011-01-06 07:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godisachild.livejournal.com
Hopefully not. I'll be honest that I'm not a "faith in other people" person. I just have faith in the behavior they usually show.

Let's hope not. If we don't get a chance to actually strike back, or capitulate on a mistake soon? Not good.

Date: 2011-01-06 08:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badend-replay.livejournal.com
Yes, a mistake... One mistake is all we may need to rip a larger hole in the uncertainty revolving around this place. We must be careful not to miss that chance.

[ and a short pause, before she adds, almost embarrassed by the fact she hadn't done this sooner. ]

I do not recall asking your name. I am the "Rika" that man thought to announce.

Date: 2011-01-06 08:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godisachild.livejournal.com
That's always the case really. You always only have a short period of time capitulate on an advantage.

[Don't worry Rika. In Pokey's case, he doesn't particularly give a damn about being polite.]

Pokey Minch.

To be fair I voted to go home, really just because I expected we were housed anyway. And I it gave me something to do.

Date: 2011-01-06 08:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badend-replay.livejournal.com
It is good to meet you, Pokey. I hope this is not our last conversation.

Date: 2011-01-06 08:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godisachild.livejournal.com
Heh.

Probably not. Don't think we'll actually be able to get out of here for awhile.

Profile

ceasetoexist: (Default)
Pokey Minch

2025

S M T W T F S

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 04:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios